Skip to main content
Displaying 1 of 1
The origins of the First World War : controversies and consensus
2002
Availability
Large Cover Image
Trade Reviews
CHOICE Review
The study of the origins of the Great War remains a hardy perennial, made more compelling over the intervening 90 years because of the conflict's seminal nature. Mombauer (Open Univ.) has neatly organized the essential historiographical strands in one slim volume, treating, in chronological order, the immediate polemics that followed the outbreak of war in 1914 and continuing to the signing of the Versailles Treaty; the bitter interwar fight waged by the "revisionists," those who denied the victors' conclusions that Germany had started the war; the controversy of the 1960s, engendered by Fritz Fischer's revelations that again asserted German "war guilt"--indeed, that there was a continuity in German foreign policy from Bismarck to Hitler; and finally, the post-Fischer period of "consensus and continuing debates," which brings the volume to the present day. The contextual analysis that explains the vitriol surrounding the "Fischer thesis" is especially noteworthy. This book is a great value for scholars seeking an overview of this complex topic and will also serve admirably in any historical methods course to trace how historians attempt to understand the past. All levels and collections. G. P. Cox Gordon College
Summary
The seminal event of the 20th century, the origins of the First World War have always been difficult to establish and have aroused deep controversy. Annika Mombauer tracks the impassioned debates as they developed at critical points through the twentieth century.nbsp;
The book focuses on the controversy itself, rather than the specific events leading up to the war. Emotive and emotional from the very beginning of the conflict, the debate and the passions aroused in response to such issues as the 'war-guilt paragraph' of the treaty of Versailles, are set in the context of the times in which they were proposed. Similarly, the argument has been fuelled by concerns over the sacrifices that were made and the casualities that were suffered. Were they really justified?
Table of Contents
Acknowledgementsp. vii
Maps
Map 1European alliances before the First World Warp. viii
Map 2German territorial losses following the Treaty of Versaillesp. ix
Introductionp. 1
Long- and short-term causes of the First World Warp. 3
The July Crisis and the outbreak of warp. 12
Part 1The Question of War Guilt during the War and at the Versailles Peace Negotiationsp. 21
Introductionp. 21
The beginning of the debate on the war's originsp. 22
The Versailles war guilt allegationp. 33
The German 'innocence campaign'p. 45
Official document collectionsp. 57
Part 2Revisionists and Anti-Revisionistsp. 78
Introductionp. 78
The German quest for a revision of Versaillesp. 79
American revisionistsp. 83
European revisionistsp. 90
Anti-revisionistsp. 98
The comfortable consensus of the 1930sp. 105
Part 3The Origins of the War and the Question of Continuity in German Historyp. 119
Introductionp. 119
The debate after the Second World War: towards a comfortable consensusp. 121
Fritz Fischer's new challenges to an old consensusp. 127
Fritz Fischer and his criticsp. 131
Support for Fischer's conclusionsp. 145
New consensus and new debate: Fischer's War of Illusionsp. 149
The search for new evidencep. 155
The end of the Fischer decadep. 161
Part 4Post-Fischer Consensus and Continuing Debatesp. 175
Introductionp. 175
Nuances in the debate in the wake of the Fischer controversyp. 176
Assessing the role of the other belligerent powers in 1914p. 186
The debate at the end of the twentieth centuryp. 208
Conclusionp. 221
Bibliographyp. 225
Indexp. 247
Librarian's View
Syndetics Unbound
Displaying 1 of 1